Intravenous regional anesthesia with 0.5% articaine, 0.5% lidocaine, or 0.5% prilocaine. A double-blind randomized clinical study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three local anesthetic agents for intravenous regional anesthesia in the upper limb. Side effects and plasma concentrations of the drugs in the doses administered for IVRA were also studied. METHODS Thirty patients in ASA groups I and II received intravenous regional anesthesia for surgery of the upper limb. In a double-blind prospective study, they were randomly allocated to receive one of three local anesthetics: articaine, lidocaine, or prilocaine. Patients received 40 mL of a 0.5% solution of the local anesthetic. The onset time of sensory block was assessed by pinprick and the extent of motor block was was scored as 0-3. Plasma concentrations of local anesthetics were determined in all patients from serial arterial blood samples drawn at predetermined times before and after tourniquet release. RESULTS The onset time of sensory block was significantly shorter (2.5 minutes) in the articaine group than in the lidocaine group (11.1 minutes) or the prilocaine group (10.9 minutes) (Scheffe, P < .05). Development of motor block was equal in all three groups (score 2). Estimation of plasma concentrations by high performance liquid chromatography showed that the peak level in all 30 patients was reached immediately after release of the tourniquet; plasma concentrations thereafter gradually declined. Maximum concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine were, 1.85, 8.5, and 4.4 micrograms/mL, respectively. No signs of local anesthetic toxicity of the cardiovascular or central nervous systems were seen. CONCLUSION Articaine had the fastest onset of sensory block and the lowest peak plasma concentration of the three local anesthetics when used for intravenous regional anesthesia.
منابع مشابه
Intravenous regional anesthesia using lidocaine and neostigmine for upper limb surgery.
STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of adding neostigmine to lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). DESIGN Randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING Tertiary-care academic medical institution. PATIENTS 40 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for elective or emergency forearm and hand surgery. INTERVENTION Patients were randomized to two groups of 20 patients ...
متن کاملEffect of intravenous regional anesthesia with spinal block on foot surgeries: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial
Introduction: Intravenous regional anesthesia is a simple and reliable method for surgeries of the lower extremities. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of regional intravenous anesthesia with spinal anesthesia on foot surgeries. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial on 60 patients undergoing foot surgery in two similar groups. In this ...
متن کاملComparison of ropivacaine 0.2% and 0.25% with lidocaine 0.5% for intravenous regional anesthesia.
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the anesthetic effects of two different concentrations and doses of ropivacaine (0.2% and 0.25%) with those of a conventional dose of lidocaine 0.5%. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, clinical investigation. SETTING Large metropolitan university hospital. PATIENTS 66 adult ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing forearm and hand surgery. ...
متن کاملAnalgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study
Background & Objective: Nowadays, conventional analgesic agents that are usually used for pain killing after cesarean sections do not provide enough analgesia with infrequent serious side effects. Lidocaine has been suggested as an adjuvant analgesic agent for postoperative pain relief. We designed this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of intr...
متن کاملComparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia.
In a single-centre, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of 2% articaine with that of a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery, using a single medial canthus injection technique. Eighty-two patients were allocated randomly to receive 7-9 ml of a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine or an equal volume of 2% articain...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Regional anesthesia
دوره 22 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1997